terminal/src/cascadia/TerminalSettingsEditor/Profiles.xaml

697 lines
52 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

<!-- Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Licensed under
the MIT License. See LICENSE in the project root for license information. -->
<Page
x:Class="Microsoft.Terminal.Settings.Editor.Profiles"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:local="using:Microsoft.Terminal.Settings.Editor"
xmlns:model="using:Microsoft.Terminal.Settings.Model"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:muxc="using:Microsoft.UI.Xaml.Controls"
mc:Ignorable="d">
<Page.Resources>
<ResourceDictionary>
<ResourceDictionary.MergedDictionaries>
<ResourceDictionary Source="CommonResources.xaml"/>
</ResourceDictionary.MergedDictionaries>
<DataTemplate x:DataType="local:EnumEntry" x:Key="EnumRadioButtonTemplate">
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<RadioButton Content="{x:Bind EnumName, Mode=OneWay}"/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:DataType="local:EnumEntry" x:Key="EnumComboBoxItemTemplate">
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<TextBlock Text="{x:Bind EnumName, Mode=OneWay}"/>
</DataTemplate>
<local:ColorToBrushConverter x:Key="ColorToBrushConverter"/>
<local:PercentageConverter x:Key="PercentageConverter"/>
<local:FontWeightConverter x:Key="FontWeightConverter"/>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<local:InvertedBooleanToVisibilityConverter x:Key="InvertedBooleanToVisibilityConverter"/>
<local:StringIsEmptyConverter x:Key="StringIsEmptyConverter"/>
<local:PaddingConverter x:Key="PaddingConverter"/>
<local:StringIsNotDesktopConverter x:Key="StringIsNotDesktopConverter"/>
<local:DesktopWallpaperToEmptyStringConverter x:Key="DesktopWallpaperToEmptyStringConverter"/>
</ResourceDictionary>
</Page.Resources>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Use a Grid instead of a StackPanel. StackPanel suppresses the inner ScrollViewer.-->
<Grid>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="auto"/>
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<TextBlock x:Uid="Profile_BaseLayerDisclaimer"
Grid.Row="0"
Margin="{StaticResource StandardIndentMargin}"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Style="{StaticResource DisclaimerStyle}"
Visibility="{x:Bind State.Profile.IsBaseLayer}"/>
<Pivot x:Name="ProfilesPivot"
HorizontalAlignment="Left"
Grid.Row="1"
SelectionChanged="Pivot_SelectionChanged"
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
Margin="1,0,0,0">
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!-- General Tab -->
<PivotItem x:Uid="Profile_General">
<ScrollViewer>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<StackPanel Style="{StaticResource PivotStackStyle}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<!--Name-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<!--NOTE: Has/Clear is not bound because we don't want the reset button & override text to appear.
Additionally, the JSON stubs generated by auto-generated profiles come with a name,
so the name will always be overridden.-->
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_Name"
Visibility="{x:Bind State.Profile.IsBaseLayer, Mode=OneWay, Converter={StaticResource InvertedBooleanToVisibilityConverter}}"
Margin="0,0,0,24">
<TextBox Text="{x:Bind State.Profile.Name, Mode=TwoWay}"
Style="{StaticResource TextBoxSettingStyle}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Commandline-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_Commandline"
x:Name="CommandlineContainer"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasCommandline, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearCommandline}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.CommandlineOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Visibility="{x:Bind State.Profile.IsBaseLayer, Mode=OneWay, Converter={StaticResource InvertedBooleanToVisibilityConverter}}"
Margin="0,0,0,24">
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<TextBox Text="{x:Bind State.Profile.Commandline, Mode=TwoWay}"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Style="{StaticResource TextBoxSettingStyle}"/>
<Button x:Uid="Profile_CommandlineBrowse"
Click="Commandline_Click"
Style="{StaticResource BrowseButtonStyle}"/>
</StackPanel>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Starting Directory-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_StartingDirectory"
x:Name="StartingDirectoryContainer"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasStartingDirectory, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearStartingDirectory}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.StartingDirectoryOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Margin="0">
<StackPanel Orientation="Vertical">
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<TextBox Text="{x:Bind State.Profile.StartingDirectory, Mode=TwoWay}"
IsEnabled="{x:Bind State.Profile.UseCustomStartingDirectory, Mode=OneWay}"
Style="{StaticResource TextBoxSettingStyle}"/>
<Button x:Uid="Profile_StartingDirectoryBrowse"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
x:Name="StartingDirectoryBrowse"
Click="StartingDirectory_Click"
IsEnabled="{x:Bind State.Profile.UseCustomStartingDirectory, Mode=OneWay}"
Style="{StaticResource BrowseButtonStyle}"/>
</StackPanel>
<CheckBox x:Uid="Profile_StartingDirectoryUseParentCheckbox"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
x:Name="StartingDirectoryUseParentCheckbox"
IsChecked="{x:Bind State.Profile.UseParentProcessDirectory, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
</StackPanel>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Icon-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_Icon"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasIcon, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearIcon}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.IconOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<TextBox Text="{x:Bind State.Profile.Icon, Mode=TwoWay}"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
FontFamily="Segoe UI, Segoe MDL2 Assets"
Style="{StaticResource TextBoxSettingStyle}"/>
<Button x:Uid="Profile_IconBrowse"
Click="Icon_Click"
Style="{StaticResource BrowseButtonStyle}"/>
</StackPanel>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Tab Title-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_TabTitle"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasTabTitle, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearTabTitle}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.TabTitleOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<TextBox Text="{x:Bind State.Profile.TabTitle, Mode=TwoWay}"
Style="{StaticResource TextBoxSettingStyle}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Hidden-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_Hidden"
Visibility="{x:Bind State.Profile.IsBaseLayer, Mode=OneWay, Converter={StaticResource InvertedBooleanToVisibilityConverter}}">
<ToggleSwitch IsOn="{x:Bind State.Profile.Hidden, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Delete Button-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<StackPanel Margin="{StaticResource StandardControlMargin}">
<Button x:Name="DeleteButton"
IsEnabled="{x:Bind State.Profile.CanDeleteProfile}"
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
Style="{StaticResource DeleteButtonStyle}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<Button.Resources>
<ResourceDictionary>
<ResourceDictionary.ThemeDictionaries>
<ResourceDictionary x:Key="Light">
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonBackground" Color="Firebrick"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonBackgroundPointerOver" Color="#C23232"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonBackgroundPressed" Color="#A21212"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonForeground" Color="White"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonForegroundPointerOver" Color="White"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonForegroundPressed" Color="White"/>
</ResourceDictionary>
<ResourceDictionary x:Key="Dark">
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonBackground" Color="Firebrick"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonBackgroundPointerOver" Color="#C23232"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonBackgroundPressed" Color="#A21212"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonForeground" Color="White"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonForegroundPointerOver" Color="White"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonForegroundPressed" Color="White"/>
</ResourceDictionary>
<ResourceDictionary x:Key="HighContrast">
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonBackground" Color="{ThemeResource SystemColorButtonFaceColor}"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonBackgroundPointerOver" Color="{ThemeResource SystemColorHighlightColor}"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonBackgroundPressed" Color="{ThemeResource SystemColorHighlightColor}"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonForeground" Color="{ThemeResource SystemColorButtonTextColor}"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonForegroundPointerOver" Color="{ThemeResource SystemColorHighlightTextColor}"/>
<SolidColorBrush x:Key="ButtonForegroundPressed" Color="{ThemeResource SystemColorHighlightTextColor}"/>
</ResourceDictionary>
</ResourceDictionary.ThemeDictionaries>
</ResourceDictionary>
</Button.Resources>
<Button.Content>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<FontIcon Glyph="&#xE74D;"
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
FontSize="{StaticResource StandardIconSize}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<TextBlock x:Uid="Profile_DeleteButton"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Margin="10,0,0,0"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</StackPanel>
</Button.Content>
<Button.Flyout>
<Flyout>
<StackPanel>
<TextBlock x:Uid="Profile_DeleteConfirmationMessage"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Style="{StaticResource CustomFlyoutTextStyle}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<Button x:Uid="Profile_DeleteConfirmationButton"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Click="DeleteConfirmation_Click"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</StackPanel>
</Flyout>
</Button.Flyout>
</Button>
<TextBlock x:Name="DeleteButtonDisclaimer"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Style="{StaticResource DisclaimerStyle}"
VerticalAlignment="Center"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</StackPanel>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
</StackPanel>
</ScrollViewer>
</PivotItem>
<!-- Appearance Tab -->
<PivotItem x:Uid="Profile_Appearance">
<ScrollViewer>
<StackPanel>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<StackPanel Style="{StaticResource PivotStackStyle}">
<!--Grouping: Text-->
<TextBlock x:Uid="Profile_TextHeader" Style="{StaticResource SubtitleTextBlockStyle}"/>
<!--Color Scheme-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_ColorScheme"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasColorSchemeName, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearColorSchemeName}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.ColorSchemeNameOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Margin="0">
<ComboBox ItemsSource="{x:Bind ColorSchemeList, Mode=OneWay}"
SelectedItem="{x:Bind CurrentColorScheme, Mode=TwoWay}"
Style="{StaticResource ComboBoxSettingStyle}">
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<ComboBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:DataType="model:ColorScheme">
<TextBlock Text="{x:Bind Name, Mode=OneWay}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</ComboBox.ItemTemplate>
</ComboBox>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Font Face-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_FontFace"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasFontFace, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearFontFace}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.FontFaceOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<TextBox Text="{x:Bind State.Profile.FontFace, Mode=TwoWay}"
Style="{StaticResource TextBoxSettingStyle}"/>
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Font Size-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_FontSize"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasFontSize, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearFontSize}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.FontSizeOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<muxc:NumberBox Value="{x:Bind State.Profile.FontSize, Mode=TwoWay}"
Style="{StaticResource NumberBoxSettingStyle}"
AcceptsExpression="False"
Minimum="1"
Maximum="128"
SmallChange="1"
LargeChange="10"/>
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Font Weight-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_FontWeight"
x:Name="FontWeightContainer"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasFontWeight, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearFontWeight}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.FontWeightOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<StackPanel>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ComboBox x:Name="FontWeightComboBox"
ItemsSource="{x:Bind FontWeightList, Mode=OneWay}"
SelectedItem="{x:Bind CurrentFontWeight, Mode=TwoWay}"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource EnumComboBoxItemTemplate}"
Style="{StaticResource ComboBoxSettingStyle}"/>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Custom Font Weight Control-->
<Grid Margin="0,10,0,0"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Visibility="{x:Bind IsCustomFontWeight, Mode=OneWay}"
Style="{StaticResource CustomSliderControlGridStyle}">
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Slider x:Name="FontWeightSlider"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Grid.Column="0"
Minimum="0" Maximum="1000"
TickFrequency="50" TickPlacement="Outside"
Value="{x:Bind State.Profile.FontWeight,
Converter={StaticResource FontWeightConverter},
Mode=TwoWay}"/>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<TextBlock Grid.Column="1"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Text="{Binding ElementName=FontWeightSlider, Path=Value, Mode=OneWay}"
Style="{StaticResource SliderValueLabelStyle}"
Margin="10,0,0,0"/>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
</Grid>
</StackPanel>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Retro Terminal Effect-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_RetroTerminalEffect"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasRetroTerminalEffect, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearRetroTerminalEffect}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.RetroTerminalEffectOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleSwitch IsOn="{x:Bind State.Profile.RetroTerminalEffect, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</local:SettingContainer>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
</StackPanel>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Grouping: Cursor-->
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<StackPanel Style="{StaticResource PivotStackStyle}">
<TextBlock x:Uid="Profile_CursorHeader" Style="{StaticResource SubtitleTextBlockStyle}"/>
<!--Cursor Shape-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_CursorShape"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasCursorShape, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearCursorShape}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.CursorShapeOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Margin="0">
<muxc:RadioButtons ItemsSource="{x:Bind CursorShapeList, Mode=OneWay}"
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
SelectedItem="{x:Bind CurrentCursorShape, Mode=TwoWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource EnumRadioButtonTemplate}"/>
</local:SettingContainer>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Cursor Height-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_CursorHeight"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasCursorHeight, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearCursorHeight}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.CursorHeightOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Visibility="{x:Bind IsVintageCursor, Mode=OneWay}">
<muxc:NumberBox Value="{x:Bind State.Profile.CursorHeight, Mode=TwoWay}"
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
Style="{StaticResource NumberBoxSettingStyle}"
Minimum="1"
Maximum="100"
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
SmallChange="1"
LargeChange="10"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
</StackPanel>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Grouping: Background-->
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<StackPanel Style="{StaticResource PivotStackStyle}">
<TextBlock x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundHeader" Style="{StaticResource SubtitleTextBlockStyle}"/>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Background Image-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImage"
x:Name="BackgroundImageContainer"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasBackgroundImagePath, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearBackgroundImagePath}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.BackgroundImagePathOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Margin="0">
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<StackPanel Orientation="Vertical">
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<TextBox Text="{x:Bind State.Profile.BackgroundImagePath, Mode=TwoWay, Converter={StaticResource DesktopWallpaperToEmptyStringConverter}}"
IsEnabled="{x:Bind State.Profile.BackgroundImagePath, Mode=OneWay, Converter={StaticResource StringIsNotDesktopConverter}}"
Style="{StaticResource TextBoxSettingStyle}"/>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<Button x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageBrowse"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Click="BackgroundImage_Click"
IsEnabled="{x:Bind State.Profile.BackgroundImagePath, Mode=OneWay, Converter={StaticResource StringIsNotDesktopConverter}}"
Style="{StaticResource BrowseButtonStyle}"/>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
</StackPanel>
<CheckBox x:Uid="Profile_UseDesktopImage"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
x:Name="UseDesktopImageCheckBox"
IsChecked="{x:Bind State.Profile.UseDesktopBGImage, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
</StackPanel>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Background Image Stretch Mode-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageStretchMode"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasBackgroundImageStretchMode, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearBackgroundImageStretchMode}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.BackgroundImageStretchModeOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Visibility="{x:Bind State.Profile.BackgroundImageSettingsVisible, Mode=OneWay}">
<muxc:RadioButtons ItemsSource="{x:Bind BackgroundImageStretchModeList, Mode=OneWay}"
SelectedItem="{x:Bind CurrentBackgroundImageStretchMode, Mode=TwoWay}"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource EnumRadioButtonTemplate}"/>
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Background Image Alignment-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageAlignment"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasBackgroundImageAlignment, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearBackgroundImageAlignment}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.BackgroundImageAlignmentOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Visibility="{x:Bind State.Profile.BackgroundImageSettingsVisible, Mode=OneWay}">
<Grid HorizontalAlignment="Left">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto"/>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto"/>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Grid.Resources>
<Style TargetType="ToggleButton" BasedOn="{StaticResource DefaultToggleButtonStyle}">
<Setter Property="Margin" Value="2"/>
<Setter Property="Width" Value="40"/>
<Setter Property="Height" Value="40"/>
<Setter Property="ToolTipService.Placement" Value="Mouse"/>
</Style>
</Grid.Resources>
<!--Top Row-->
<ToggleButton x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageAlignmentTopLeft"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
x:Name="BIAlign_TopLeft"
Grid.Row="0" Grid.Column="0"
Click="BIAlignment_Click">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleButton.Tag>
<!--ConvergedAlignment: Vertical_Top (0x10) | Horizontal_Left (0x01)-->
<x:Int32>17</x:Int32>
</ToggleButton.Tag>
<ToggleButton.Content>
<FontIcon FontFamily="Segoe MDL2 Assets" Glyph="&#xE744;" RenderTransformOrigin="0.5,0.5">
<FontIcon.RenderTransform>
<RotateTransform Angle="90"/>
</FontIcon.RenderTransform>
</FontIcon>
</ToggleButton.Content>
</ToggleButton>
<ToggleButton x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageAlignmentTop"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
x:Name="BIAlign_Top"
Grid.Row="0" Grid.Column="1"
Click="BIAlignment_Click">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleButton.Tag>
<!--ConvergedAlignment: Vertical_Top (0x10) | Horizontal_Center (0x00)-->
<x:Int32>16</x:Int32>
</ToggleButton.Tag>
<ToggleButton.Content>
<FontIcon FontFamily="Segoe MDL2 Assets" Glyph="&#xE745;" RenderTransformOrigin="0.5,0.5">
<FontIcon.RenderTransform>
<RotateTransform Angle="180"/>
</FontIcon.RenderTransform>
</FontIcon>
</ToggleButton.Content>
</ToggleButton>
<ToggleButton x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageAlignmentTopRight"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
x:Name="BIAlign_TopRight"
Grid.Row="0" Grid.Column="2"
Click="BIAlignment_Click">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleButton.Tag>
<!--ConvergedAlignment: Vertical_Top (0x10) | Horizontal_Right (0x02)-->
<x:Int32>18</x:Int32>
</ToggleButton.Tag>
<ToggleButton.Content>
<FontIcon FontFamily="Segoe MDL2 Assets" Glyph="&#xEA5F;" RenderTransformOrigin="0.5,0.5">
<FontIcon.RenderTransform>
<RotateTransform Angle="270"/>
</FontIcon.RenderTransform>
</FontIcon>
</ToggleButton.Content>
</ToggleButton>
<!--Middle Row-->
<ToggleButton x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageAlignmentLeft"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
x:Name="BIAlign_Left"
Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="0"
Click="BIAlignment_Click">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleButton.Tag>
<!--ConvergedAlignment: Vertical_Center (0x00) | Horizontal_Left (0x01)-->
<x:Int32>1</x:Int32>
</ToggleButton.Tag>
<ToggleButton.Content>
<FontIcon FontFamily="Segoe MDL2 Assets" Glyph="&#xE746;"/>
</ToggleButton.Content>
</ToggleButton>
<ToggleButton x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageAlignmentCenter"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
x:Name="BIAlign_Center"
Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="1"
Click="BIAlignment_Click">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleButton.Tag>
<!--ConvergedAlignment: Vertical_Center (0x00) | Horizontal_Center (0x00)-->
<x:Int32>0</x:Int32>
</ToggleButton.Tag>
<ToggleButton.Content>
<FontIcon FontFamily="Segoe MDL2 Assets" Glyph="&#xF16E;"/>
</ToggleButton.Content>
</ToggleButton>
<ToggleButton x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageAlignmentRight"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
x:Name="BIAlign_Right"
Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="2"
Click="BIAlignment_Click">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleButton.Tag>
<!--ConvergedAlignment: Vertical_Center (0x00) | Horizontal_Right (0x02)-->
<x:Int32>2</x:Int32>
</ToggleButton.Tag>
<ToggleButton.Content>
<FontIcon FontFamily="Segoe MDL2 Assets" Glyph="&#xEA61;"/>
</ToggleButton.Content>
</ToggleButton>
<!--Bottom Row-->
<ToggleButton x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageAlignmentBottomLeft"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
x:Name="BIAlign_BottomLeft"
Grid.Row="2" Grid.Column="0"
Click="BIAlignment_Click">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleButton.Tag>
<!--ConvergedAlignment: Vertical_Bottom (0x20) | Horizontal_Left (0x01)-->
<x:Int32>33</x:Int32>
</ToggleButton.Tag>
<ToggleButton.Content>
<FontIcon FontFamily="Segoe MDL2 Assets" Glyph="&#xE744;"/>
</ToggleButton.Content>
</ToggleButton>
<ToggleButton x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageAlignmentBottom"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
x:Name="BIAlign_Bottom"
Grid.Row="2" Grid.Column="1"
Click="BIAlignment_Click">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleButton.Tag>
<!--ConvergedAlignment: Vertical_Bottom (0x20) | Horizontal_Center (0x00)-->
<x:Int32>32</x:Int32>
</ToggleButton.Tag>
<ToggleButton.Content>
<FontIcon FontFamily="Segoe MDL2 Assets" Glyph="&#xE745;"/>
</ToggleButton.Content>
</ToggleButton>
<ToggleButton x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageAlignmentBottomRight"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
x:Name="BIAlign_BottomRight"
Grid.Row="2" Grid.Column="2"
Click="BIAlignment_Click">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleButton.Tag>
<!--ConvergedAlignment: Vertical_Top (0x20) | Horizontal_Right (0x02)-->
<x:Int32>34</x:Int32>
</ToggleButton.Tag>
<ToggleButton.Content>
<FontIcon FontFamily="Segoe MDL2 Assets" Glyph="&#xEA5F;"/>
</ToggleButton.Content>
</ToggleButton>
</Grid>
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Background Image Opacity-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_BackgroundImageOpacity"
x:Name="BackgroundImageOpacityContainer"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasBackgroundImageOpacity, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearBackgroundImageOpacity}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.BackgroundImageOpacityOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Visibility="{x:Bind State.Profile.BackgroundImageSettingsVisible, Mode=OneWay}">
<Grid Style="{StaticResource CustomSliderControlGridStyle}">
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Slider x:Name="BIOpacitySlider"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Grid.Column="0"
Value="{x:Bind State.Profile.BackgroundImageOpacity, Converter={StaticResource PercentageConverter}, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<TextBlock Grid.Column="1"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Text="{Binding ElementName=BIOpacitySlider, Path=Value, Mode=OneWay}"
Style="{StaticResource SliderValueLabelStyle}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</Grid>
</local:SettingContainer>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
</StackPanel>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Grouping: Acrylic-->
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<StackPanel Style="{StaticResource PivotStackStyle}">
<TextBlock x:Uid="Profile_AcrylicHeader" Style="{StaticResource SubtitleTextBlockStyle}"/>
<!--Use Acrylic-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_UseAcrylic"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasUseAcrylic, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearUseAcrylic}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.UseAcrylicOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Margin="0">
<ToggleSwitch x:Name="UseAcrylicToggleSwitch"
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
IsOn="{x:Bind State.Profile.UseAcrylic, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Acrylic Opacity-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_AcrylicOpacity"
x:Name="AcrylicOpacityContainer"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasAcrylicOpacity, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearAcrylicOpacity}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.AcrylicOpacityOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Visibility="{Binding ElementName=UseAcrylicToggleSwitch, Path=IsOn, Mode=OneWay}">
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<StackPanel x:Name="AcrylicOpacityControl">
<Grid Style="{StaticResource CustomSliderControlGridStyle}">
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Slider x:Name="AcrylicOpacitySlider"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Grid.Column="0"
Value="{x:Bind State.Profile.AcrylicOpacity, Converter={StaticResource PercentageConverter}, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<TextBlock Grid.Column="1"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Text="{Binding ElementName=AcrylicOpacitySlider, Path=Value, Mode=OneWay}"
Style="{StaticResource SliderValueLabelStyle}"/>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
</Grid>
</StackPanel>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
</StackPanel>
<!--Grouping: Window-->
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<StackPanel Style="{StaticResource PivotStackStyle}">
<TextBlock x:Uid="Profile_WindowHeader" Style="{StaticResource SubtitleTextBlockStyle}"/>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Padding-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_Padding"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasPadding, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearPadding}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.PaddingOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Margin="0">
<Grid Style="{StaticResource CustomSliderControlGridStyle}">
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Slider x:Name="PaddingSlider"
Grid.Column="0"
Value="{x:Bind State.Profile.Padding, Converter={StaticResource PaddingConverter}, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<TextBlock Grid.Column="1"
Text="{Binding ElementName=PaddingSlider, Path=Value, Mode=OneWay}"
Style="{StaticResource SliderValueLabelStyle}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</Grid>
</local:SettingContainer>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<!--Scrollbar Visibility-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_ScrollbarVisibility"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasScrollState, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearScrollState}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.ScrollStateOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<muxc:RadioButtons ItemsSource="{x:Bind ScrollStateList, Mode=OneWay}"
SelectedItem="{x:Bind CurrentScrollState, Mode=TwoWay}"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource EnumRadioButtonTemplate}"/>
</local:SettingContainer>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
</StackPanel>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
</StackPanel>
</ScrollViewer>
</PivotItem>
<!-- Advanced Tab -->
<PivotItem x:Uid="Profile_Advanced">
<ScrollViewer>
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
<StackPanel Style="{StaticResource PivotStackStyle}">
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Suppress Application Title-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_SuppressApplicationTitle"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasSuppressApplicationTitle, Mode=OneWay}"
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearSuppressApplicationTitle}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.SuppressApplicationTitleOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}"
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
Margin="0">
<ToggleSwitch IsOn="{x:Bind State.Profile.SuppressApplicationTitle, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Antialiasing Mode-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_AntialiasingMode"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasAntialiasingMode, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearAntialiasingMode}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.AntialiasingModeOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<muxc:RadioButtons ItemsSource="{x:Bind AntiAliasingModeList, Mode=OneWay}"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
SelectedItem="{x:Bind CurrentAntiAliasingMode, Mode=TwoWay}"
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource EnumRadioButtonTemplate}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--AltGr Aliasing-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_AltGrAliasing"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasAltGrAliasing, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearAltGrAliasing}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.AltGrAliasingOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleSwitch IsOn="{x:Bind State.Profile.AltGrAliasing, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Snap On Input-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_SnapOnInput"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasSnapOnInput, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearSnapOnInput}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.SnapOnInputOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<ToggleSwitch IsOn="{x:Bind State.Profile.SnapOnInput, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--History Size-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_HistorySize"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasHistorySize, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearHistorySize}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.HistorySizeOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<muxc:NumberBox Value="{x:Bind State.Profile.HistorySize, Mode=TwoWay}"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
Style="{StaticResource NumberBoxSettingStyle}"
Minimum="0"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
SmallChange="10"
LargeChange="100"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Close On Exit-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_CloseOnExit"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasCloseOnExit, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearCloseOnExit}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.CloseOnExitOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<muxc:RadioButtons ItemsSource="{x:Bind CloseOnExitModeList, Mode=OneWay}"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
SelectedItem="{x:Bind CurrentCloseOnExitMode, Mode=TwoWay}"
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource EnumRadioButtonTemplate}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
<!--Bell Style-->
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<local:SettingContainer x:Uid="Profile_BellStyle"
HasSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.HasBellStyle, Mode=OneWay}"
Introduce setting override tracking and update SettingContainer (#9079) This PR adds improved override message generation for inheritance in SUI. The settings model now has an `OriginTag` to be able to denote where a `Profile` came from. This tag is used in the `SettingContainer` to generate a more specific override message. ## References #6800 - SUI Epic #8919 - SUI Inheritance PR #8804 - SUI Inheritance (old issue) ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments - **Terminal Settings Model** - Introduced `PROJECTED_SETTING` as a macro to more easily declare the functions for each setting - Introduced `<setting>OverrideSource` which finds the `Profile` that has \<setting\> defined - Introduced `OriginTag Profile::Origin {Custom, InBox, Generated}` to trace where a profile came from - `DefaultProfileUtils` creates profiles for profile generators. So that now sets the `Origin` tag to `Generated` - `CascadiaSettings::LoadDefaults()` tags all profiles created as `InBox`. - The view model had to ingest the API change to be able to interact with `<setting>OverrideSource` - **Override Message Generation** - The reset button now has a more specific tooltip - The reset button now only appears if base layer is being overridden - We use the settings model changes to determine the message to display for the target ## Validation Steps Performed Tested the following cases: - overrides nothing (inherited setting) - overrides value inherited from... - base layer - a profile generator - in-box profile - global settings should not have this feature
2021-02-20 00:50:52 +01:00
ClearSettingValue="{x:Bind State.Profile.ClearBellStyle}"
SettingOverrideSource="{x:Bind State.Profile.BellStyleOverrideSource, Mode=OneWay}">
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
<muxc:RadioButtons ItemsSource="{x:Bind BellStyleList, Mode=OneWay}"
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
SelectedItem="{x:Bind CurrentBellStyle, Mode=TwoWay}"
Include UWP styling guidance in settings UI (#8831) <!-- Enter a brief description/summary of your PR here. What does it fix/what does it change/how was it tested (even manually, if necessary)? --> ## Summary of the Pull Request The settings UI was _close_ to looking just right, it just needed some tweaks to adhere to the proper guidance: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/uwp/design/controls-and-patterns/forms This PR changes the font sizes, spacing, and layout of all of the pages to align with guidance. Some pics: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241313-58194980-5b22-11eb-9f18-524cc988ec33.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241331-60718480-5b22-11eb-8698-b9fadf3c3016.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105244413-57ce7d80-5b25-11eb-87c3-ee5f19417318.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241384-73845480-5b22-11eb-9517-4010b145ffc2.png) Min width: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/48369326/105241406-7aab6280-5b22-11eb-9c59-ffc72f66509d.png) <!-- Other than the issue solved, is this relevant to any other issues/existing PRs? --> ## References <!-- Please review the items on the PR checklist before submitting--> ## PR Checklist * [x] Closes #8816 * [x] CLA signed. If not, go over [here](https://cla.opensource.microsoft.com/microsoft/Terminal) and sign the CLA * [ ] Tests added/passed * [ ] Documentation updated. If checked, please file a pull request on [our docs repo](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal) and link it here: #xxx * [ ] Schema updated. * [x] I've discussed this with core contributors already. If not checked, I'm ready to accept this work might be rejected in favor of a different grand plan. Issue number where discussion took place: #xxx <!-- Provide a more detailed description of the PR, other things fixed or any additional comments/features here --> ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments * Removed custom font sizing, WinUI adheres to guidance anyway * 24px spacing between controls and 48px between groupings * Controls shouldn't be next to each other (see Launch size) * Technically Launch size is a grouping, so it gets upgraded to subtitle status * Left margins for pages have been fixed to left align with the page titles * Single checkboxes have been changed to toggle switches <!-- Describe how you validated the behavior. Add automated tests wherever possible, but list manual validation steps taken as well --> ## Validation Steps Performed
2021-01-20 23:42:39 +01:00
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource EnumRadioButtonTemplate}"/>
Represent inheritance in Settings UI (#8919) ## Summary of the Pull Request Introduces the `SettingContainer`. `SettingContainer` is used to wrap a setting in the settings UI and provide the following functionality: - a reset button next to the header - tooltips and automation properties for the setting being wrapped - a comment stating if you are currently overriding a setting ## References [Spec - Inheritance in Settings UI](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/main/doc/specs/%231564%20-%20Settings%20UI/cascading-settings.md) #8804 - removes the ambiguity of leaving a setting blank #6800 - Settings UI Epic #8899 - Automation properties for Settings UI #8768 - Keyboard Navigation ## PR Checklist * [X] Closes #8804 ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments A few highlights in this PR: - CommonResources.xaml: - we need to merge the SettingContainerStyle.xaml in there. Otherwise, XAML doesn't merge these files properly and can't apply the template. - Profiles.cpp: - view model checks if the starting directory and background image were reset, to determine which value to show when unchecking the special value - `Profiles::OnNavigatedTo()` needs a property changed handler to update its own "Current<Setting>" and update the UI properly - Profiles.xaml: - basically wrapped all of the settings we want to be inheritable in there - `Binding` is used instead of `x:Bind` in some places because `x:Bind` can't find the parent `SettingContainer` and gives you a compiler error. - Resources.resw: - had to set the "HeaderText" and "HelpText" on each setting container. Does a decent localization burden, unfortunately. - `SettingContainer` files - This operates by creating a template and applying that template over other settings. This allows you to inject the existing controls inside of this. This means that we need to provide our UIElements names and access/modify them via `OnApplyTemplate` - We had to remove the header from each individual control, and have `SettingContainer` be in charge of it. This allows us to add the reset button in there. - Due to the problem mentioned earlier about CommonResources.xaml, we can't reference anything from CommonResources.xaml. - Using `DependencyProperty` to let us set a few properties in the XML files. Particularly, `Has<Setting>` and `Clear<Setting>` are what do all the heavy lifting of interacting with the inheritance model. ## Demo ![Inheritance Demo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11050425/106192086-92a56680-6160-11eb-838c-4ec0beb54965.gif) ## Validation Steps Performed - Verified correct binding behavior with the following generic setting controls: - radio buttons - toggle switch - text block - slider - settings with browse buttons - the background image alignment control - controls with special check boxes (starting directory and background image) ## Next Steps - The automation properties have been verified using NVDA. This is a part of resolving #8899. - The override text is currently "Overrides a setting". According to #8269, we actually want to add a hyperlink in there that navigates to the parent profile object. This will be a follow-up task as it requires settings model changes.
2021-02-08 19:04:43 +01:00
</local:SettingContainer>
Add UI for adding, renaming, and deleting a color scheme (#8403) Introduces the following UI controls to the ColorSchemes page: - "Add new" button - next to dropdown selector - adds a new color scheme named ("Color Scheme #" where # is the number of color schemes you have) - "Rename" Button - next to the selector - replaces the ComboBox with a TextBox and the accept/cancel buttons appear - "Delete" button - bottom of the page - opens flyout, when confirmed, deletes the current color scheme and selects another one This also adds a Delete button to the Profiles page. The Hide checkbox was moved above the Delete button. ## References #1564 - Settings UI #6800 - Settings UI Completion Epic ## Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments **Color Schemes:** - Deleting a color scheme selects another one from the list available - Rename replaces the combobox with a textbox to allow editing - The Add New button creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" where X is the number of schemes defined - In-box color schemes cannot be deleted **Profile:** - Deleting a profile selects another one from the list available - the rename button does not exist (yet), because it needs a modification to the NavigationView's Header Template - The delete button is disabled for in-box profiles (CMD and Windows Powershell) and dynamic profiles ## Validation Steps Performed **Color Schemes - Add New** ✅ Creates a new color scheme named "Color Scheme X" (X being the number of color schemes) ✅ The new color scheme can be renamed/deleted/modified **Color Schemes - Rename** ✅ You cannot rename an in-box color scheme ✅ The rename button has a tooltip ✅ Clicking the rename button replaces the combobox with a textbox ✅ Accept --> changes name ✅ Cancel --> does not change the name ✅ accepting/cancelling the rename operation updates the combo box appropriately **Color Schemes - Delete** ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Deleting a color scheme removes it from the list and select the one under it ✅ Deleting the last color scheme selects the last available color scheme after it's deleted ✅ In-box color schemes have the delete button disabled, and a disclaimer appears next to it **Profile- Delete** ✅ Base layer presents a disclaimer at the top, and hides the delete button ✅ Dynamic and in-box profiles disable the delete button and show the appropriate disclaimer next to the disabled button ✅ Clicking delete produces a flyout to confirm deletion ✅ Regular profiles have a delete button that is styled appropriately ✅ Clicking the delete profile button opens a content dialog. Confirmation deletes the profile and navigates to the profile indexed under it (deleting the last one redirects to the last one) ## Demo Refer to this post [here](https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747545651. Confirmation flyout demo: https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/pull/8403#issuecomment-747657842
2020-12-18 00:14:07 +01:00
</StackPanel>
</ScrollViewer>
</PivotItem>
</Pivot>
</Grid>
</Page>